Hamlet. Sheffield Crucible. 23-09-10

John Simms Hamlet at Sheffield Crucible has attracted a lot of silly and sometimes snide comment ( along with the admiration) even from those who should know better,  so I shall start by saying that he is not a celebrity, he is a fine actor, and whether he is “better” or “worse” than David Tennant is totally irrelevant. Every actor who is faced with the challenge of playing Hamlet digs deep into themselves to find the character, someone who is all things to all men, and their take on the part comes from what they find there. It is John Simm’s first Shakespeare role and I saw only his second performance. He can be proud of himself without any doubt. His Hamlet is very much a bookish student rather than a sweet prince. He speaks the verse simply and directly, with a clear understanding of the text and is able to make it live. He is relatively old to play Hamlet, but he portrayed a man who is young, dynamic and vulnerable, a slight figure on stage who thinks quickly and intelligently, someone who is not easy to fool. I liked his relationship with Ophelia, particularly during the play within a play, and the obvious love that he had for her made the scene at her graveside very moving.

John Simm and John Nettles as Hamlet and Claudius. Production still by Tristram Kenton.

The rest of the cast provide solid support. John Nettles is an excellent Claudius. He begins with the kind of constant overbearing bonhomie that invariably hides something and during the course of the play, as this is stripped away, we see him realise that one way or another his sins are going to find him out. Hugh Ross is very good indeed, a warm, funny and irritating Polonius and a wise, sharp witted gravedigger. I also liked Colin Tierney very much as Horatio. He has great presence on stage and was a credible friend for Hamlet, more than you could say for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern who I felt were a terrible misjudgement. Barbara Flynn’s Gertrude was nicely done, although I prefer a sharper, cleverer reading of the part. Michelle Dockery looked lovely, moved well and spoke the verse beautifully but I couldn’t help feeling, later in the play, that Ophelia’s madness doesn’t really sit well with that kind of composure and elegance. I have never yet seen an Ophelia who completely works for me, and I’m beginning to wonder if I ever will. Laertes is a nice part for a young actor, an uncomplicated, dynamic, loyal brother, and Tim Delap played it with just the right directness and attack. I was delighted by young Alexander Vlahos as Osric. It was a quirky little cameo, done with great style, which never descended into a comic turn.

John simm and Michelle Dockery as Hamlet and Ophelia (watching the players perform). Production still by Tristram Kenton.

The set was a simple, grey curling balcony with central doors and bookcases underneath and the empty space of the Crucible stage jutting out in front. The atmosphere seemed to be drawn from somewhere in Eastern Europe with wintry birch trees visible during the outdoor scenes and a cold dim light. The staging was sparse with little furniture and few props. This left the actors relying on the verse, which is good, especially in a wonderful, intimate space like the Crucible, but it did make for one or two awkward moments where they had to work a bit too hard to find variety and different levels. All the cast played the space beautifully, including all the audience on all three sides and drawing us in.. Malcolm Ranson, who must have directed more stage fights than I have had hot dinners by now, treated us to a terrific fight with foils at the end of the play. All in all it was a great evening. Hamlet is such a complex play that there are always gains and losses however you approach it. It will never be perfect and we shouldn’t expect it to be. That’s what makes it worth coming back over and over again.


9 comments on “Hamlet. Sheffield Crucible. 23-09-10

  1. “John Simms Hamlet at Sheffield Crucible has attracted a lot of silly and sometimes snide comment ( along with the admiration) even by those who should know better, so I shall start by saying that he is not a celebrity, he is a fine actor, and whether he is “better” or “worse” than David Tennant is totally irrelevant.”

    Amen. One of my favourite actors.

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alexander Vlahos, Marit Røkeberg. Marit Røkeberg said: @vlavla "delighted by young Alexander Vlahos"… http://bit.ly/8XxNdH […]

  3. Elizabeth says:

    Congratulations on your very well deserved Twitter mention, Pat. This is a fabulous review and perfectly represents how I viewed the production as well. x

  4. Hilda says:

    I’m interested to know why you thought Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were a terrible misjudgement?? I thought they were great actually. A nice cameo for Rosencrantz in particular who made something of the part at least!


    • patricia1957 says:

      I felt that Rosencrantz completely overdid the character and was not a credible friend for Hamlet or a credible character in his own right. All the creeping around became tedious for me. Guildenstern was better but rather forgettable- I didn’t really register his character much at all.
      Sorry to be a bit harsh. I much prefer to be positive and enthusiastic which is why I didn’t go into detail in the blog.

  5. Hilda says:

    I don’t think your being harsh particularly, its all down to interpretation. Although I have to say I disagree with you completely! Rosencrantz and Guilderstern aren’t supposed to be credible friends, they are old friends from school who haven’t seen Hamlet for some time. Personally I thought that it was Horatio who was not a credible friend, not loyal enough, too aloof actually and Laertes passed me by completely. I found him too forced, not dynamic and rather forgettable. I liked the actors who actually did something with their parts; interpretation and character instead of just words. Perhaps at the end of the day it was the direction that let it down – in terms of the creeping around etc. overall I didn’t feel any of the characters really ‘gelled’.

    • patricia1957 says:

      Isn’t it interesting how differently we can see things? What did you think of John Simm? He had some harsh criticism from one or two reviews I’ve seen- completely unjustified as far as I’m concerned. The Telegraph said that watching him after seeing David Tennant was like seeing a boy sent on to do a man’s work which I thought was not only wrong, but snide too. I think that you are right about the direction which was why I said that R and J were a misjudgment rather than criticising them as actors. I realise that they are old schoolfriends not current friends- that didn’t help me take to them I’m afraid. 🙂

  6. Edzel2 says:

    I agree with you about John Simm, Patricia; I thought he was mesmerising in the part and couldn’t understand where the Telegraph review was coming from at all, nor why anyone would want to compare John’s portrayal with David Tennant’s – both were great in their own way, and naturally different. Obviously it’s fine to prefer one actor’s interpretation over another’s (we all have our opinions after all) but there was absolutely no need to take the tone the Telegraph reviewer took at all – one can review without being snide or spiteful.

    I also enjoyed Alexander Vlahos’ portrayals – his Player Queen was great (especially the little shimmy-dance he gave on the two performances I saw) and his Osric was, as you say, very stylish and humorous. I think he will be one to watch!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s